<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Etiquette Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/</link>
	<description>Trying to live large ...one step at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:23:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fabulously Broke</title>
		<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabulously Broke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/?p=745#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>Sending hubby solo = not acceptable

It is kind of rude to back out with 2 months to go when she had agreed a year ago

But if they are REALLY in financial straits, they can come clean and say: look we can&#039;t afford it when we thought we could because he lost his job etc

Ultimately, if it means more to husband and he wants to go - she shouldn&#039;t take her emotions into account because it&#039;s HIS friends and if it were the reverse she may have made the decision to go instead of waffling between going/staying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sending hubby solo = not acceptable</p>
<p>It is kind of rude to back out with 2 months to go when she had agreed a year ago</p>
<p>But if they are REALLY in financial straits, they can come clean and say: look we can&#8217;t afford it when we thought we could because he lost his job etc</p>
<p>Ultimately, if it means more to husband and he wants to go &#8211; she shouldn&#8217;t take her emotions into account because it&#8217;s HIS friends and if it were the reverse she may have made the decision to go instead of waffling between going/staying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devil</title>
		<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>devil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/?p=745#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>The wedding&#039;s in two months and they&#039;ve known for over a year? It&#039;s MUCH too late to cancel now. They could have been saving money for this event for the year they&#039;ve known about it. Then they&#039;d be prepared for the wedding duty even after a layoff.

If the wife feels no &quot;vested interest&quot; in attending now, why did she agree to this obligation last year? Some people need to learn to say no graciously.

I think it would be terribly rude to back out at this late date. And, no, sending the husband solo is NOT acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wedding&#8217;s in two months and they&#8217;ve known for over a year? It&#8217;s MUCH too late to cancel now. They could have been saving money for this event for the year they&#8217;ve known about it. Then they&#8217;d be prepared for the wedding duty even after a layoff.</p>
<p>If the wife feels no &#8220;vested interest&#8221; in attending now, why did she agree to this obligation last year? Some people need to learn to say no graciously.</p>
<p>I think it would be terribly rude to back out at this late date. And, no, sending the husband solo is NOT acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livingalmostlarge</title>
		<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Livingalmostlarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/?p=745#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>Guess I should add they were asked over 1 year ago according to the woman.  The wedding is in 2 months.  So it&#039;s been awhile in the planning, hence why they have their clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess I should add they were asked over 1 year ago according to the woman.  The wedding is in 2 months.  So it&#8217;s been awhile in the planning, hence why they have their clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/?p=745#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>They have to either both go or both not go I think.  They are a couple and were invited as a couple and are in the wedding party as a couple.  They should attend or decline as a couple.

And they should probably both go since

A) they&#039;ve committed to it and already have their clothes and its only a few months away and

B) DH is &quot;very very&quot; close to the couple and would probably hold it against you for a long time for preventing him from going.  The money saved won&#039;t be worth the relationship suffering.

C)  Since they are both in the wedding party it will be extremelly annoying (maybe impossible) to find one extra female to replace the wife if she doesn&#039;t go.  On the other hand it may not be difficult to just lop off both of them the list and then still have an equal number of groomsmen and bridesmaids.

D)  Plus it&#039;s kind of impluasible to use the &quot;we can&#039;t afford it so only DH is going&quot; excuse, since that will hardly cut the cost (unless DH can shack up with some other single groomsman or something and avoid a hotel room expense).

As to the general question of &quot;how late is too late to back out&quot; I think it depends on how long ago they agreed to be in it.  If they already have their wedding clothes that indicates it has probably been at least several months which is too long, in my opinion.

Just dip into savings, consider it your vacation for a year (or two), and cut where you can to make up for it elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have to either both go or both not go I think.  They are a couple and were invited as a couple and are in the wedding party as a couple.  They should attend or decline as a couple.</p>
<p>And they should probably both go since</p>
<p>A) they&#8217;ve committed to it and already have their clothes and its only a few months away and</p>
<p>B) DH is &#8220;very very&#8221; close to the couple and would probably hold it against you for a long time for preventing him from going.  The money saved won&#8217;t be worth the relationship suffering.</p>
<p>C)  Since they are both in the wedding party it will be extremelly annoying (maybe impossible) to find one extra female to replace the wife if she doesn&#8217;t go.  On the other hand it may not be difficult to just lop off both of them the list and then still have an equal number of groomsmen and bridesmaids.</p>
<p>D)  Plus it&#8217;s kind of impluasible to use the &#8220;we can&#8217;t afford it so only DH is going&#8221; excuse, since that will hardly cut the cost (unless DH can shack up with some other single groomsman or something and avoid a hotel room expense).</p>
<p>As to the general question of &#8220;how late is too late to back out&#8221; I think it depends on how long ago they agreed to be in it.  If they already have their wedding clothes that indicates it has probably been at least several months which is too long, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Just dip into savings, consider it your vacation for a year (or two), and cut where you can to make up for it elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janel</title>
		<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>Janel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/?p=745#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>My answer is: it depends.

If the wedding has been in the works for 12-18 months and you agreed to be in it a year ago, yes, it&#039;s too probably late to back out without very hard feelings.

If this is a whirlwind wedding that will only be 3-4 months from engagement to wedding, you were just asked last week and the dress was purchased shortly after, you can probably bow out with a reasonable explanation - and send a really great gift!

It also depends on how friendly these friends are. Almost any girlfriend of mine would understand if I sat down and explained to her the $$ problems we were going through. Some folks aren&#039;t so understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My answer is: it depends.</p>
<p>If the wedding has been in the works for 12-18 months and you agreed to be in it a year ago, yes, it&#8217;s too probably late to back out without very hard feelings.</p>
<p>If this is a whirlwind wedding that will only be 3-4 months from engagement to wedding, you were just asked last week and the dress was purchased shortly after, you can probably bow out with a reasonable explanation &#8211; and send a really great gift!</p>
<p>It also depends on how friendly these friends are. Almost any girlfriend of mine would understand if I sat down and explained to her the $$ problems we were going through. Some folks aren&#8217;t so understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Livingalmostlarge</title>
		<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Livingalmostlarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/?p=745#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>Tod they both are part of the wedding party, not just her husband, in case it wasn&#039;t clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tod they both are part of the wedding party, not just her husband, in case it wasn&#8217;t clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dogatemyfinances</title>
		<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>dogatemyfinances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/?p=745#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>This conversation is months too late.  If she already has the dress, it will be hard and AWKWARD to replace her in the wedding party, and that is what the bride will remember.  (Uh, Cousin Sally, are you a size 8?  Want to be in my wedding?)

If you are in the wedding party, you are not a guest of a dear friend.  That bride has told you that you are incredibly important part of the wedding.  Maybe that&#039;s wrong and she has no friends.  But that should have been discussed months ago.  Too late now.  I can&#039;t even imagine how hurt I would be if a bridesmaid bailed on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This conversation is months too late.  If she already has the dress, it will be hard and AWKWARD to replace her in the wedding party, and that is what the bride will remember.  (Uh, Cousin Sally, are you a size 8?  Want to be in my wedding?)</p>
<p>If you are in the wedding party, you are not a guest of a dear friend.  That bride has told you that you are incredibly important part of the wedding.  Maybe that&#8217;s wrong and she has no friends.  But that should have been discussed months ago.  Too late now.  I can&#8217;t even imagine how hurt I would be if a bridesmaid bailed on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd the Bod</title>
		<link>http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/2008/06/29/etiquette-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd the Bod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livingalmostlarge.com/?p=745#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s completely acceptable for him to go and her to stay home.  Sounds like a good compromise and a smart decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s completely acceptable for him to go and her to stay home.  Sounds like a good compromise and a smart decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
